Mississippi River Water Management Plan (MRWMP)
Update: 23 August, 2010
Background
Most of us are aware that the levels on our lake are controlled to some extent, but we wonder why flooding occasionally
occurs, and sometimes levels drop late in the summer. There is a dam at Carleton Place, so why can't the lake be maintained
at a constant level?
There is no simple answer because the problem is quite complex. This lake is part of the Mississippi River watershed, a
vast network of lakes, rivers and streams with a drainage area of 3750 sq. km. The river is 212 km long and there are
approximately 268 lakes. Most of the water that feeds this system arrives during a short period of time during the spring
runoff; average rainfall in the area is not sufficient to provide flows to maintain suitable lake levels, especially on
Dalhousie and Mississippi Lakes. In order to manage these two conflicting situations, (and many other issues including
ecological, wildlife habitat, erosion, etc.) the various dams on the watershed are operated to minimize flooding while
maintaining a supply of water in the western reservoir lakes to augment the lower flows in late summer. There are many
other conflicting water management issues which must be addressed.
Mississippi Valley Conservation has the task of managing the water levels on this watershed. Although an informal
operating plan has been 'tweaked' over the years, a formal Mississippi River Water Management Plan is presently being
developed.
The following discussion of general operating principals was provided by Gord Mountenay, Water Management Supervisor,
Mississippi Valley Conservation.
Mississippi River Watershed General Operating Principals
All of the dams in the western portion of the Mississippi River watershed were originally built to maintain enough water
in the system to allow timbers to be floated downstream three or four times a year. The purposes of these structures have
become diversified with the changing conditions in the watershed. As well as flood protection, low flow augmentation, ice
management, erosion control and recreation, they also must be operated to maintain specific flow and level requirements for
lake trout, walleye, bass, pike and as much as possible all other fish species. Stable levels are required for wildlife
such as loons, frogs, muskrat and beaver. Continuous flows must be maintained to sustain the ecological integrity of the
system including flushing rates for maintaining water quality in the lakes and rivers. If possible, flows are maintained to
allow hydro producers to continue operating their generating facilities. The management of the river system has become
increasingly more difficult as storms and droughts have tended to be more severe and more restrictions have been placed on
how dams may be operated. This watershed historically receives approximately 750 mm of precipitation annually; it loses
approximately 300 mm of that to evaporation annually, thereby leaving only 400 mm for groundwater supply, to fill the upper
lakes and to maintain a minimal flow throughout the year.
There are six major lakes in the watershed which act as storage reservoirs in the spring to alleviate flooding
downstream of Crotch Lake. These are Shabomeka, Mazinaw, Kashwakamak, Big Gull, Mississagagon and Crotch Lakes, all of
which have water control structures at their outlets. There are two other notable lakes on the main branch of the
Mississippi River, being Dalhousie and Mississippi Lakes. Neither of these lakes have a dam at their outlet although
Mississippi Lake is influenced by the Carleton Place Dam under low flow conditions and limited influence under high flow
conditions due to configuration of the channel leading to the dam from the lake. Both of these lakes are heavily developed.
Every fall, the dams are operated to draw down the lakes to provide storage for the spring runoff. As snowmelt and spring
rains occur, the lakes are gradually filled to reach the summer target levels for recreation and tourism. Conditions must
be monitored to ensure that the targets can be reached while ensuring that adequate storage remains for late spring rainfalls
and sufficient flows and levels are maintained for spawning fish. In doing so, there is a reduction in flooding to areas
downstream as the uncontrolled flows from Antoine and Cranberry Creeks, the Fall and Clyde River systems move through the
central and eastern portion of the watershed. Once the runoff is over, all of the control dams, except for the Crotch Lake
Dam, are operated to maintain relatively stable elevations on the lakes for recreation throughout the summer months. Crotch
Lake Dam is unique as Crotch is the only true reservoir lake on the system.
From late June through early October, Crotch Lake is drawn down to ensure flows in the lower portion of the river.
Under normal conditions, approximately 60% of the flow in the river comes from Crotch Lake. During the droughts of 2001 and
2002, 100 % of the flow in the river below Crotch Lake came from Crotch Lake as all other tributaries dried up to virtually
nothing. The upper lakes were operated to bring levels down to the bottom of their respective target ranges to maintain
flow in the river in the western portion of the watershed and areas downstream. Crotch Lake normally fluctuates from 2.5 to
3.5 m (depending on amount of precipitation) over the course of the summer, every summer. Throughout the fall, as the other
lakes are being drawn down, Crotch Lake is filled again while still maintaining at least a minimum flow to ensure the
ecological integrity of the system downstream of the dam. From January through March the lake is again drawn down to perform
the same low flow augmentation function over the remainder of the winter months and to maximize storage in the lake for the
spring.
So there is some of the background and rationale for the present operating plan. The following article describes the
effort to produce a formal operating plan, providing a brief background and purpose, schedules, and website address where
additional information is available.
While the Mississippi River Water Management Plan (MRWMP) was undertaken because hydro facilities exist on the
Mississippi, hydro production is not the driver for water management operations on the Mississippi. This is highlighted in
the article title, that the title, that the MRWMP is "an integrated approach" to maximize all uses of the
river including waterpower, flood control, low flow augmentation, fish and wildlife, tourism and recreation.
Canadian Hydro Developers Inc., Enerdu Power Systems Ltd., Mississippi River Power Corporation, Ontario Power
Generation and the Mississippi Valley Conservation undertook a study to review the operational management of water control
structures (dams and hydro-power facilities) on the Mississippi River system. The purpose of this project was to develop a
water management plan that considers the interests and concerns of all users through balanced operational management of
water levels and flows for the potentially competing uses of the Mississippi River waters. The generating facilities and
water control structures subject to the plan are: Galetta Generating Station (G.S.), Almonte G.S., Enerdu G.S., Appleton
G.S., Carleton Place Dam, High Falls G.S., Crotch Lake Dam, Mississagagon Lake Dam, Big Gull Lake Dam, Kashwakamak Lake
Dam, Mazinaw Lake Dam and Shabomeka Lake Dam.
.
The Mississippi River Water Management Plan final report was released June 15 2005.
For more information about the Mississippi River Water Management Plan, please contact:
Gord Mountenay, Water Management Supervisor
Mississippi Valley Conservation
Lanark
Phone: (613) 259-2421, extension 233
Email:
Gord Mountenay
Sarah MacHardy
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Phone: (613) 258-8386
Email:
Sarah MacHardy
Or visit the website
http://www.mississippiwaterpowerplan.com
MLA Particiption
As part of the planning process, a Public Advisory Committee (PAC) was established to provide advice and comments to the
facility owners and MNR on the development of the water management plan and to assist in carrying out the public
consultation program. The volunteer members of the PAC have varied backgrounds and interests, including: landowners with
property on or near the river, municipalities, local business, tourism & other industries, anglers & hunters, lake
associations, naturalist clubs, recreational groups and other resource user groups. Ed Carew, an MLA Director, was one of
the 12 Public Advisory Committee members for the Mississippi River Water Management Plan for Waterpower project, and has
continued as a member of the Standing Advisory Committee (SAC).
|